Arnold Library

Use of complementary and alternative medicine and breast cancer survival in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle Study

Neuhouser, Marian L. and Smith, Ashley Wilder and George, Stephanie M. and Gibson, James T. and Baumgartner, Kathy B. and Baumgartner, Richard and Duggan, Catherine and Bernstein, Leslie and McTiernan, Anne and Ballard, Rachel (2016) Use of complementary and alternative medicine and breast cancer survival in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle Study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 160 (3). pp. 539-546. ISSN 0167-6806

[img]
Preview
Text
Neuhouser_BreastCancerResTreat_Dec2016.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (185kB) | Preview
Article URL: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4010-x

Abstract

PURPOSE: Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common among breast cancer patients, but less is known about whether CAM influences breast cancer survival. METHODS: Health Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle (HEAL) Study participants (n = 707) were diagnosed with stage I-IIIA breast cancer. Participants completed a 30-month post-diagnosis interview including questions on CAM use (natural products such as dietary and botanical supplements, alternative health practices, and alternative medical systems), weight, physical activity, and comorbidities. Outcomes were breast cancer-specific and total mortality, which were ascertained from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registries in Western Washington, Los Angeles County, and New Mexico. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit to data to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for mortality. Models were adjusted for potential confounding by sociodemographic, health, and cancer-related factors. RESULTS: Among 707 participants, 70 breast cancer-specific deaths and 149 total deaths were reported. 60.2 % of participants reported CAM use post-diagnosis. The most common CAM were natural products (51 %) including plant-based estrogenic supplements (42 %). Manipulative and body-based practices and alternative medical systems were used by 27 and 13 % of participants, respectively. No associations were observed between CAM use and breast cancer-specific (HR 1.04, 95 % CI 0.61-1.76) or total mortality (HR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.63-1.29). CONCLUSION: Complementary and alternative medicine use was not associated with breast cancer-specific mortality or total mortality. Randomized controlled trials may be needed to definitively test whether there is harm or benefit from the types of CAM assessed in HEAL in relation to mortality outcomes in breast cancer survivors.

Item Type: Article or Abstract
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4010-x
PubMed ID: 27766453
NIHMSID: 887709
Other ID: WOS:000387342800014
Grant Numbers: N01-CN-75036-20, N01-CN-05228, N01-PC-67010, M01-RR-00037, M01-RR-0997, 050Q-8709-S1528
Fred Hutch Divisions: Public Health Sciences
Depositing User: Allysha Eyler
Date Deposited: 23 Jun 2017 15:13
Last Modified: 01 Dec 2017 08:17
URI: http://authors.fhcrc.org/id/eprint/1201

Repository Administrators Only

View Item View Item
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N. PO Box 19024
Seattle, WA 98109

a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.

© Terms of Use & Privacy Policy